Feature Overview
This page explains not just what each module does, but why the workflow produces better decisions with less complexity.
Why This Workflow Is Different
- The product is intentionally not a giant settings playground.
- You are not expected to manage hundreds of technical knobs before seeing useful candidates.
- The algorithm does the heavy pre-selection work, while you keep the final decision authority.
- This creates a practical balance: automation for scale, human control for preference and risk tolerance.
- The full flow is built to stay understandable from first shortlist to final portfolio action.
Low Risk Mode
- Low Risk Mode supports beginners with conservative risk settings. It limits excessive risk early and makes the decision process simpler, clearer, and more reliable.
- Note: Only experienced users should start without Low Risk Mode. Losses are still possible even in Low Risk Mode.
Cash Model Auswahl
- You secure the full strike amount with cash. Usually simpler and more transparent for risk control.
- Margin / Naked: You use broker buying power instead of full cash coverage. Capital use can be lower, but risk and complexity are higher. Note: This model is generally intended for advanced or professional users.
Screener
- No configuration overload: instead of hundreds of switches, you start with a clear, curated process.
- The algorithm is designed to pre-qualify finalists so you are not forced to engineer a scanner from zero.
- Filtering remains in your control: you decide which finalists match your cycle, risk, and return preferences.
- Warnings and exclusions are built into the flow, so weak candidates are reduced before manual review.
- Outcome: less time spent in setup complexity, more time spent on actual decisions.
Analyzer Engine
- Single-contract evaluation uses the same framework as the Screener, so shortlist logic and final checks stay aligned.
- Signal views surface risk and quality factors fast, reducing blind spots in contract selection.
- You can compare finalists with consistent logic instead of mixing different mental models.
- The output is designed to support portfolio decisions, not to produce another isolated report.
- Outcome: decision-ready contracts with a clear bridge into portfolio management.
Portfolio Planner
- Portfolio view combines holdings, live price updates, and sector visibility in one planning surface.
- Capital allocation and sector allocation are explicit, measurable, and adjustable.
- Suggested additions can be reviewed and transferred into holdings with minimal friction.
- Rebalancing support helps convert analysis into repeatable portfolio actions.
- Especially for ETF-oriented workflows, sector allocation helps improve diversification and avoid hidden concentration.
- Outcome: a structured portfolio process from candidate to allocation decision.
Why Planner Matters For Serious Portfolio Control
- Planner is focused on portfolio-level control, not just contract-level analysis.
- It makes capital and sector allocation central to the decision process.
- That is especially important in ETF-based approaches where diversification quality drives stability.
- Result: fewer accidental concentration risks and clearer allocation discipline.
Example: ETF Sector Mix
SPY and TQQQ can look diversified at ticker level, but their sector concentration can still overlap heavily.
Snapshot date in this example: April 30, 2026. Sector weights change continuously over time and should always be re-checked before decisions.
SPY/TQQQ sector-mix example
- Information Technology: 31.2%
- Financials: 12.8%
- Health Care: 11.6%
- Consumer Discretionary: 10.2%
- Communication Services: 8.9%
- Other Sectors: 25.3%
Important:sector allocation becomes significantly harder to judge when ETF exposure is combined with individual stocks and options positions in the same portfolio.
Bundle recommendation based on workflow depth
- Bundle Premium (search, analyze, plan): strongest setup for a complete end-to-end workflow, from candidate discovery to contract validation to portfolio-level allocation in one continuous process.
- Screener + Planner: only this combination gives you the direct one-click handoff from new put options into Planner allocation. Without both modules, that workflow bridge is missing.
- Screener + Analyzer: ideal if you want to pre-filter at scale and then validate selected contracts with deeper analysis before execution, including one-click data transfer from Screener to Analyzer.